On 02/11/2013 08:46 AM, Olof Johansson wrote: > On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 8:59 AM, Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> * Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [130117 07:19]: >>> On Thu, 17 Jan 2013, Roger Quadros wrote: >>> >>>> Let's have a single platform data structure for the OMAP's High-Speed >>>> USB host subsystem instead of having 3 separate ones i.e. one for >>>> board data, one for USB Host (UHH) module and one for USB-TLL module. >>>> >>>> This makes the code much simpler and avoids creating multiple copies of >>>> platform data. >>>> >>>> CC: Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros <rogerq@xxxxxx> >>> >>> For the ehci-omap.c part: >>> >>> Acked-by: Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> If Samuel acks this patch, I can apply just this patch alone on v3.8-rc3 >> into an immutable branch omap-for-v3.9/board-usb so we all merge it in >> as needed. > > So, that didn't happen; Samuel applied it from the mailing list and > sfr just hit merge conflicts due to it. > > Sigh. > > This patch (touching arch/arm/mach-omap2) didn't have acks from Tony either. Oops, this is my bad :(. Should have flagged Samuel about it. Will be more careful next time. > > Samuel, Tony, can you sort this out with a stable short topic branch > as Tony suggested? It'd be nice to avoid the merge conflict by a > little coordination here. :( > > cheers, -roger -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
