On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 8:59 AM, Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > * Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [130117 07:19]: >> On Thu, 17 Jan 2013, Roger Quadros wrote: >> >> > Let's have a single platform data structure for the OMAP's High-Speed >> > USB host subsystem instead of having 3 separate ones i.e. one for >> > board data, one for USB Host (UHH) module and one for USB-TLL module. >> > >> > This makes the code much simpler and avoids creating multiple copies of >> > platform data. >> > >> > CC: Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros <rogerq@xxxxxx> >> >> For the ehci-omap.c part: >> >> Acked-by: Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > If Samuel acks this patch, I can apply just this patch alone on v3.8-rc3 > into an immutable branch omap-for-v3.9/board-usb so we all merge it in > as needed. So, that didn't happen; Samuel applied it from the mailing list and sfr just hit merge conflicts due to it. Sigh. This patch (touching arch/arm/mach-omap2) didn't have acks from Tony either. Samuel, Tony, can you sort this out with a stable short topic branch as Tony suggested? It'd be nice to avoid the merge conflict by a little coordination here. :( -Olof -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
