Re: [PATCH] usb: gadget: remove inode.c

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 04:27:49PM +0100, Michal Nazarewicz wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 24 2013, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > the benefit is that we will be able to go ahed with configfs-based
> > binding and will be able to drop duplicated gadget code between legacy
> > (non-composite) and composite framework with the function drivers.
> 
> I'm not sure whether keeping gadgetfs around is such a big issue
> though.  It would be legacy, deprecated piece of code which cannot be
> used with composite functions, but so what?

When you have to keep an eye on over 100KLOCs, it helps sharing code as
much as possible.

> Obviously I won't be stopping anyone from creating a compatibility
> layer, but I really don't think it's worth it.  If it were, I'd write
> functionfs to use gadgetfs' interface in the first place.

Right, that would've been the best approach.

-- 
balbi

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Old Linux USB Devel Archive]

  Powered by Linux