Hi, On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 06:28:19PM +0100, Michal Nazarewicz wrote: > On Thu, Jan 24 2013, Greg KH wrote: > > gadgetfs is a userspace api that I don't think we can just drop all > > that easily. Does f_fs do everything that gadgetfs does? > > gadgetfs and functionfs have a different API so f_fs cannot be used as > a drop-in replacement for gadgetfs. Hmm, looks like there's no easy way out. Can we (easily) make a compatibility layer between the two ? What are the biggest differences ? -- balbi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
