Re: [PATCH 1/2]linux-usb:Define a new macro for USB storage match rules

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 01:39:50AM +0000, Fangxiaozhi (Franko) wrote:
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Greg KH [mailto:greg@xxxxxxxxx]
> > Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2013 1:45 AM
> > To: Fangxiaozhi (Franko)
> > Cc: Sergei Shtylyov; linux-usb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> > Xueguiying (Zihan); Linlei (Lei Lin); Yili (Neil); Wangyuhua (Roger, Credit);
> > Huqiao (C); balbi@xxxxxx; mdharm-usb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> > sebastian@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2]linux-usb:Define a new macro for USB storage match
> > rules
> > 
> > On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 04:18:34PM +0400, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> > > Hello.
> > >
> > > On 25-01-2013 6:44, fangxiaozhi 00110321 wrote:
> > >
> > > >From: fangxiaozhi <huananhu@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > >1. Define a new macro for USB storage match rules:
> > > >     matching with Vendor ID and interface descriptors.
> > >
> > > >Signed-off-by: fangxiaozhi <huananhu@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >
> > > >  diff -uprN linux-3.8-rc4_orig/drivers/usb/storage/usb.c
> > > >linux-3.8-rc4/drivers/usb/storage/usb.c
> > > >--- linux-3.8-rc4_orig/drivers/usb/storage/usb.c 2013-01-22
> > > >14:12:42.595238727 +0800
> > > >+++ linux-3.8-rc4/drivers/usb/storage/usb.c 2013-01-22
> > > >+++ 14:16:01.398250305 +0800
> > > >@@ -120,6 +120,17 @@ MODULE_PARM_DESC(quirks, "supplemental l
> > > >   .useTransport = use_transport, \
> > > >  }
> > > >
> > > >+#define UNUSUAL_VENDOR_INTF(idVendor, cl, sc, pr, \
> > > >+         vendor_name, product_name, use_protocol, use_transport, \
> > > >+         init_function, Flags) \
> > > >+{ \
> > > >+ .vendorName = vendor_name, \
> > > >+ .productName = product_name, \
> > > >+ .useProtocol = use_protocol, \
> > > >+ .useTransport = use_transport, \
> > > >+ .initFunction = init_function, \
> > > >+}
> > >
> > >   Shouldn't the field initilaizers be indented with tab, not space?
> > 
> > Yes it must.  fangxiaozhi, please always run your patches through the
> > scripts/checkpatch.pl tool before sending them out (note, you will have to
> > ignore the CamelCase warnings your patch produces, but not the other
> > ones.)
> > 
> -----What's wrong with it?
> -----I have checked the patches with scripts/checkpatch.pl before sending.
> -----There is no other warning or error in my patches except CamelCase warnings.
> -----So what's wrong now?

Then your email client messed up the patches and put spaces in the code
instead of tabs.  Try looking at the message on the mailing list and run
that through checkpatch, it will show you the problems.

What I received isn't ok, sorry.

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Old Linux USB Devel Archive]

  Powered by Linux