On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 01:08:41AM +0100, Wolfgang Frisch wrote: > On 14/01/13 16:37, Johan Hovold wrote: > > I've prepared a patch series which removes the custom chase_port > > function and replaces it with the corresponding generic implementations > > instead (which does not suffer from the problem you found). > > > > However, I think your solution is probably the best one for the stable > > trees as it is less intrusive. > > > > Care to resubmit your patch with a short description and perhaps the > > stack trace from your original report? Have look at > > Documentation/SubmittingPatches for details (e.g. you need to add a > > Signed-off-by line and should configure you mail client to send the patch > > as an inline attachment). Please see my notes on the patch below as > > well. > Thanks for your clarifying and helpful comments! > I just resubmitted my patch. > > > > I'll respond to this mail with my series which should also fix the > > problem (and which could later be applied on top of your patch). If you > > could test it on actual hardware it would be much appreciated. > Your patches work fine on Linux 3.7.2 with a Watchport/H sensor. Thanks for testing! Johan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
