On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 02:45:16PM +0200, Roger Quadros wrote: > On 01/17/2013 02:27 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 02:10:18PM +0200, Roger Quadros wrote: > >> On 01/17/2013 01:45 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote: > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 01:30:24PM +0200, Roger Quadros wrote: > >>>> @@ -598,6 +639,24 @@ static int usbhs_omap_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > >>>> clkname, PTR_ERR(pclk)); > >>>> else > >>>> omap->utmi_clk[i] = pclk; > >>>> + > >>>> + snprintf(clkname, sizeof(clkname), > >>>> + "usb_host_hs_hsic480m_p%d_clk", i + 1); > >>> > >>> do we really need to know the exact clock node name ? > >>> > >> I think so. Do you have a better suggestion? > > > > update CLKDEV entries ? I mean, what if we have a new OMAP or AMxxxx > > device with a different clock name ? That will be a big bummer. > > > > In that case we simply need to add the relevant CLKDEV entries/aliases > for the new platform. I don't think anything needs to be changed in the > driver. We are still using clk_get(dev, clk_name), so the CLKDEV > framework will return the best matching clock for the device. fair enough ;-) -- balbi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
