On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 02:10:18PM +0200, Roger Quadros wrote: > On 01/17/2013 01:45 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 01:30:24PM +0200, Roger Quadros wrote: > >> @@ -598,6 +639,24 @@ static int usbhs_omap_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > >> clkname, PTR_ERR(pclk)); > >> else > >> omap->utmi_clk[i] = pclk; > >> + > >> + snprintf(clkname, sizeof(clkname), > >> + "usb_host_hs_hsic480m_p%d_clk", i + 1); > > > > do we really need to know the exact clock node name ? > > > I think so. Do you have a better suggestion? update CLKDEV entries ? I mean, what if we have a new OMAP or AMxxxx device with a different clock name ? That will be a big bummer. -- balbi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
