Balbi, On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 02:50:59PM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote: > As I said before, this patch is too big for -rc and is unnecessary > considering patch I wrote above. Note that there is no problems in > checking if ULPI PHY clk is 60MHz on all arches and, for the workaround, > you already have a runtime check. > Ok, I did not have these facts on my mind. If these are true, the cpu_is_xxx() shouldn't be necessary there from the beginning, and we can simply remove them then. > Shawn, it can be broken down into smaller pieces because you can *FIX > THE COMPILE BREAKAGE* with a very small patch as above (only issue now > is usage of MX32_IO_ADDRESS()). > The MX35_IO_ADDRESS() also seems unnecessary, since as Peter's patch suggested that pdata->regs can be used instead. Shawn -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
