On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 01:29:19AM +0100, Timur wrote: > On 12/11/2012 12:04 AM, Greg KH wrote: > >On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 11:53:27PM +0100, Timur wrote: > >> > >>N7 is not using a vanilla kernel. > >Yes, I know that quite well :) > > > >>It is one thing to apply > >>modifications to the given code base. It would be far more difficult > >>(I think) to replace the kernel as a whole. Maybe I should back port > >>just as little code as possible? Or maybe I should try to back port > >>some full building blocks? Where to make the cut? I also wonder how > >>to make the system take advantage of ehci_suspend() and > >>ehci_resume(), both marked as "__maybe_unused". Who is calling these > >>methods? > >Look at the newer kernels for what is going on there. > > > >As for which is easier, that's up to you, there has been a lot of work > >to integrate the out-of-tree tegra and android code and get it merged to > >the main kernel since 3.1 was released over a year ago, so it depends on > >what you feel comfortable with doing. > > Wow, I was not aware of this. Can you please point me to a > N7-compatible configuration for a more recent kernel? Your existing configuration should work, but you need to verify that all of the board support patches are upstream already, that might be the hard part. good luck, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
