On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 02:43:25PM -0500, Alan Stern wrote: > On Mon, 10 Dec 2012, Sarah Sharp wrote: > > > > Do you think we will ever need to do the mapping in the other > > > direction? > > > > Meaning the xHCI driver would need to know which ACPI method was > > attached to a raw port? I don't think so. The code in usb-acpi.c > > should abstract that away from the xHCI driver. > > No, I meant will we ever need to translate a "raw" port number into a > usbcore-style port number and root hub. For example, if an ACPI event > occurs and it's associated with an ACPI port, we'd want to know which > port that really was. Hmm, I'm not sure. I don't think there are any ACPI events associated with a port, but Tianyu should be able to answer that question. Sarah Sharp -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
