On Mon, 10 Dec 2012, Sarah Sharp wrote: > > Do you think we will ever need to do the mapping in the other > > direction? > > Meaning the xHCI driver would need to know which ACPI method was > attached to a raw port? I don't think so. The code in usb-acpi.c > should abstract that away from the xHCI driver. No, I meant will we ever need to translate a "raw" port number into a usbcore-style port number and root hub. For example, if an ACPI event occurs and it's associated with an ACPI port, we'd want to know which port that really was. Alan Stern -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
