Re: [RFC v2] usb/gadget: the start of the configfs interface

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> On 11/30/2012 07:39 PM, Michal Nazarewicz wrote:
>> Yeah, but what Felipe just made me realise is that if that's the case,
>> than it makes no sense to have the functions directory outside of the
>> gadget.  Instead we should have something like:

On Mon, Dec 03 2012, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> Yes. Except if we want to move functions from one udc to another.
> Doesn't this look useful? Are sure we won't to disallow this?

But there is no need for functions to be outside of gadget for that.
After all, one does not move a single function between UDCs, one moves
the whole gadgets.

-- 
Best regards,                                         _     _
.o. | Liege of Serenely Enlightened Majesty of      o' \,=./ `o
..o | Computer Science,  Michał “mina86” Nazarewicz    (o o)
ooo +----<email/xmpp: mpn@xxxxxxxxxx>--------------ooO--(_)--Ooo--

Attachment: pgpefeqRX6MSd.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Old Linux USB Devel Archive]

  Powered by Linux