On Wed, Nov 21 2012, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > So you say "keep the patch as it with this module-parameter > compatibility"? I'm saying that in my opinion external behaviour of the gadgets should not change until a configfs solution is ready and final. As for the patch, I had some concerns about addition of the flat list of arguments as this looked to me as a quick hack which will be removed once configfs is ready any way. Just my 0.02 CHF. -- Best regards, _ _ .o. | Liege of Serenely Enlightened Majesty of o' \,=./ `o ..o | Computer Science, Michał “mina86” Nazarewicz (o o) ooo +----<email/xmpp: mpn@xxxxxxxxxx>--------------ooO--(_)--Ooo--
Attachment:
pgpUEgq44eOkf.pgp
Description: PGP signature
