Re: [RFC] How to handle delays in isochronous transfers?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 25 Sep 2012, Laurent Pinchart wrote:

> > All right.  It sounds like as far as uvcvideo is concerned, recovering
> > video-in frame synchronization after a drop-out doesn't matter very
> > much.  You don't much care if some of the frames are gone from the data
> > stream with no indication as to how many were skipped over.  Or if you
> > do care, you don't think there's much to be done about it.
> 
> I care, but I don't think the USB core can provide me with any useful 
> information.

In that case I'll go ahead with the proposed API change.  Leaving 
URB_ISO_ASAP enabled for all your URBs should continue to work as well 
as could be expected.

Alan Stern

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Old Linux USB Devel Archive]

  Powered by Linux