On Thursday 20 September 2012, Shawn Guo wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 07:39:34AM +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > The first five branches are scheduled to go through the arm-soc tree, so > > I'm fine with that. For the sound/for-3.7 branch, I'd like to know when > > to expect that hitting mainline. If it always gets in very early during the > > merge window, it's probably ok to put the imx/multi-platform patches into > > the same branch as the other ones in arm-soc and wait for the sound stuff > > to hit mainline first, otherwise I'd suggest we start a second > > next/multiplatform-2 branch for imx and send the first part early on > > but then wait with the second batch before sound gets in. > > > It seems that we will have to go with next/multiplatform-2. I just > tried to merge the series with linux-next together, and got some > non-trivial conflicts with media and mtd tree. I might have to rebase > my series on top of these trees to sort out those conflicts. That said, > I will have several dependencies outside arm-soc tree, and have to pend > my series until all those trees get merged into mainline. Ok, fair enough. I think we can put it in arm-soc/for-next as a staging branch anyway to give it some exposure to linux-next, and then we can decide whether a rebase is necessary before sending it to Linus. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
