RE: usb : mass storage : short_not_ok for non usb3 udc

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 25 Jul 2012, Paul Zimmerman wrote:

> > From: Alan Stern [mailto:stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2012 12:48 PM
> > To: Paul Zimmerman
> > Cc: Rajaram R; Michal Nazarewicz; linux-usb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: RE: usb : mass storage : short_not_ok for non usb3 udc
> > 
> > On Wed, 25 Jul 2012, Paul Zimmerman wrote:
> > 
> > > > > > I don't understand this either.  What's wrong with setting
> > > > > > short_not_ok while at SuperSpeed?  It shouldn't force the use of a
> > > > bounce buffer.
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I have just brought back some code removed by patch "usb: fix mass
> > > > > storage gadgets to work with Synopsys UDC".
> > > >
> > > > Maybe while bringing it back you can remove the checks for SuperSpeed.
> > > > Is there any reason to keep them?
> > >
> > > Hi Alan,
> > >
> > > The problem only arises because at super-speed the MaxPacket size is
> > > 1024, which is greater than the sector size of 512. So the whole point of
> > > the patch is to fix the SuperSpeed operation, while allowing high-speed
> > > devices to operate as they always did.
> > 
> > Don't the mass-storage drivers already operate correctly at SuperSpeed?
> > If not, what goes wrong?
> > 
> > Besides, how could the patch possibly affect SuperSpeed operation?
> > Everything it does is protected by
> > 
> > 		if (!gadget_is_superspeed(gadget))
> > 
> > So I'm afraid I don't understand your point.
> 
> Sorry for not being clear. The original patch:
> 
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-usb/msg52549.html
> 
> was required to make mass-storage work with DWC3 at SuperSpeed.
> However, it apparently broke platforms like musb which depend on
> short-not-ok being set. The current patch fixes that, by setting
> short-not-ok if not running SuperSpeed. DWC3 will still work fine
> with this latest patch, since its problem was only with SuperSpeed.

Okay, that's fine.  But it doesn't answer my earlier question: Is there 
really any need for the SuperSpeed checks in this patch?

In other words, will DWC3 continue to work correctly if short_not_ok is
set?

Alan Stern

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Old Linux USB Devel Archive]

  Powered by Linux