On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 8:52 PM, Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > This new SYSTEM_SUSPEND state is declared above and only assigned here > to system_state without being tested anywhere. AFAICT, the only test > you're doing is system_state != SYSTEM_RUNNING and that works without > defining a new SYSTEM_SUSPEND state. > > So are you sure you really need it? If the approach is workable, I will rename SYSTEM_SUSPEND_DISK as SYSTEM_SUSPEND since SYSTEM_SUSPEND_DISK is not used now. Thanks, -- Ming Lei -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
