On Tue, 10 Jul 2012, Richard Zhao wrote: > > > @@ -4037,6 +4038,13 @@ static void hub_port_connect_change(struct usb_hub *hub, int port1, > > > } > > > } > > > > > > + if (unlikely(hcd->phy && !hdev->parent)) { > > > > Why is this "unlikely"? And why mark it as such, is this a "fast path" > > that needs the compiler to know this hint to optimize things here? > > > > Please don't use likely() or unlikely() except in places it really is > > needed, _and_ you have measured the difference. Have you done so in > > this place? > It's from a comment by Alan Stern. > http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-usb/msg64987.html That comment was made in a somewhat different context. At the time the code was part of an interrupt handler; now it isn't. > Actually, for my board, it's not unlikely. But for others which don't > have notify_connect/disconnect, it's unlikely. > > Because it's not unlikely for all boards, I prefer remove "unlikely". It's no longer a big deal one way or another. I don't care about the "unlikely" because it's on a cold path running in process context. Go ahead and remove it. Alan Stern -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html