Bjørn Mork <bjorn@xxxxxxx> writes: > So how about something like this? It really simplifies the probing > logic in all affected drivers, including indirectly affected drivers > like cdc-ether. > > I am aware that the last patch is too large. I couldn't help refactoring > the code somewhat to share subdriver registration code. Will most likely > have to split that up before real submission. > > But I'd appreciate comments on this at this point anyway. And do note > that this is not so much about the currently supported devices, as those > not supported mainly because we don't know how to match the data > interface Not many comments here... I take that as "go ahead and submit patches". Another argument for this solution just came up: Splitting the control and data interface between two drivers create the illusion that you may apply new device ID patches independently. In particular that you can apply the patches for cdc-wdm to stable/longterm kernels not having qmi_wwan. Bjørn -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
