Hello. On 10-06-2012 8:30, Anil Nair wrote:
On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 12:18 AM, Sergei Shtylyov<sshtylyov@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Yeah, KGDB was accepted into kernel exactly for more "poorly fixed patches" to appear. :-)
I was under the impression that maintainers would never recommend kgdb, so never learned to use it. If you could guide me and Prasanna on how to use kgdb that would be helpful :).
For the starters, Prasanna should ask his KGDB question in the right mailing list, kgdb-bugreport@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.
If you were saying it sarcastically, then i failed to understand it . :P.
Yes, there was sarcasm. If KGDB was only providing for "poorly fixed patches", it would have been hardly included in the kernel.
You have to use gdbserver
gdbserver is only good for debugging the applications.
I never knew that..!.
Besides, there's not much difference between remotely debugging applications via gdbserver and remotely debugging kernel via KGDB.
WBR, Sergei -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
