Hi, (please don't top-post, ever) On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 12:06:21PM +0530, Rajaram R wrote: > Hi Felipe/Paul > > Any reason for removing short_not_ok ? I believe it still holds true > even after this patch. I will push a patch for the same if there is no > objection. It doesn't hold true at all. We _want_ a short packet in order to end the transfer. Let me illustrate: We want to receive 31-byte CBw, but our UDC can't handle short packets on OUT direction, so we start a transfer for wMaxPacketSize. If we said short_not_ok, the driver wouldn't like when we received 31-byte and ended the transfer. -- balbi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
