Re: [PATCH 4/4] USB: Chipidea: use simple incremental integter as device id

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 01:25:19PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 05:53:51PM +0800, Richard Zhao wrote:
> > On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 05:51:00PM +0800, Richard Zhao wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 05:35:22PM +0800, Richard Zhao wrote:
> > > > On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 12:24:08PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > > 
> > > > > On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 11:13:40AM +0800, Richard Zhao wrote:
> > > > > 
> > > > > needs commit log
> > > > ok
> > > > > 
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Richard Zhao <richard.zhao@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > > ---
> > > > > >  drivers/usb/chipidea/core.c |   20 ++++++++++++++++++--
> > > > > >  1 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/chipidea/core.c b/drivers/usb/chipidea/core.c
> > > > > > index d645396..767ccf7 100644
> > > > > > --- a/drivers/usb/chipidea/core.c
> > > > > > +++ b/drivers/usb/chipidea/core.c
> > > > > > @@ -332,6 +332,23 @@ static irqreturn_t ci_irq(int irq, void *data)
> > > > > >  	return ci->role == CI_ROLE_END ? ret : ci_role(ci)->irq(ci);
> > > > > >  }
> > > > > >  
> > > > > > +static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(dev_id_lock);
> > > > > > +static int dev_id;
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +static int ci_get_id(void)
> > > > > > +{
> > > > > > +	unsigned long flags;
> > > > > > +	int id;
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +	spin_lock_irqsave(&dev_id_lock, flags);
I don't need to disable irq here.
> > > > > > +	id = dev_id++;
> > > > > > +	if (dev_id < 0)
> > > > > > +		dev_id = 0;
> > > > > > +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev_id_lock, flags);
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +	return id;
> > > > > > +}
> > > > > 
> > > > > if you used a bitmap you wouldn't need the lock.
> > > > but it needs a loop. hmm.. bitmap is better. I'll change
> > > > that way as dwc3_get_device_id.
> > > Note that we'll need a ci13xxx_remove_device to put id.
> > If it supports hotplug, the ids may be like 0 1 2 3 1 0 3 ...
> > It's bad comparing to incremental method.
> 
> sorry, can you explain why that could/would happen and why is it bad ?
pci device may have hotplug capability.
It the id is smaller than last one, people may be confused which is new
one.

Thanks
Richard
> 
> -- 
> balbi



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Old Linux USB Devel Archive]

  Powered by Linux