Hi Alexis, Quach, Brian wrote: > Hello, > > I work for Texas Instruments on the group that develops our USB 3.0 > products. Recently, we discovered a timing issue in our USB3.0 > re-drivers that can delay the negotiation between a device and the > host past the usual handshake timeout, and if that happens on the > first insertion, the host controller port will enter in Compliance > mode as per the xHCI spec. The host controller does not generate a I think I faced this problem some days ago with a SilverStone Treasure TS04B external HDD case. It has ASM1051 A1 chipset, claiming to be ASM2105. For some reason, this (high-speed-only) does not happen with another device (MANHATTAN USB3.0 to SATA dongle rev. 3.04 (Model No. 150705) which also reports itself to contain ASM2105. Sometimes when I plugged in the device for the first time it was NOT recognized at all. And if I remember right there was nothing logged using usbmon. On sub-sequent re-connect of the device is caught up, yes. The TS04B device always only at high-speed. Would you please comment what could be the difference between the two devices with supposedly same chip? Firmware? > Port Status Change (PSC) event as a result of a transition to > compliance mode so the only way method to detect and resolve the > issue is to periodically poll the port to check for compliance mode > and issue a Warm Reset to recover the port. This polling is only > required if the port had never previously entered U0. > > We implemented a small app to monitor the device's PORTSC registers > and to issue a warm reset whenever we find the port is in compliance > mode. Although this seems to work-around the issue, we believe this > should be implemented on the driver source code for robustness. > > Due to your bandwidth limitations, I was told that we should be > making our own patches and submitting them to you for integration > into the mainline. Based on the information I provided about the > issue, can you provide any advice on how/where the source code the > patch should be implemented so that it will be acceptable for the > mainline and whether it should be a menuconfig option. Is the below different visible to the user what you describe above? --- MANHATTAN_via_TI.lsusb 2012-05-10 22:20:07.000000000 +0200 +++ SilverStone_TS04B_via_TI.lsusb 2012-05-03 11:55:50.000000000 +0200 @@ -1,23 +1,23 @@ -Bus 004 Device 009: ID 174c:5106 ASMedia Technology Inc. +Bus 003 Device 003: ID 174c:5106 ASMedia Technology Inc. Device Descriptor: bLength 18 bDescriptorType 1 - bcdUSB 3.00 + bcdUSB 2.10 bDeviceClass 0 (Defined at Interface level) bDeviceSubClass 0 bDeviceProtocol 0 - bMaxPacketSize0 9 + bMaxPacketSize0 64 idVendor 0x174c ASMedia Technology Inc. idProduct 0x5106 bcdDevice 0.01 iManufacturer 2 ASMedia iProduct 3 AS2105 - iSerial 1 Z1F09686 + iSerial 1 WD-WX51C10U8155 bNumConfigurations 1 Configuration Descriptor: bLength 9 bDescriptorType 2 - wTotalLength 44 + wTotalLength 32 bNumInterfaces 1 bConfigurationValue 1 iConfiguration 0 @@ -42,9 +42,8 @@ Transfer Type Bulk Synch Type None Usage Type Data - wMaxPacketSize 0x0400 1x 1024 bytes + wMaxPacketSize 0x0200 1x 512 bytes bInterval 0 - bMaxBurst 15 Endpoint Descriptor: bLength 7 bDescriptorType 5 @@ -53,33 +52,8 @@ Transfer Type Bulk Synch Type None Usage Type Data - wMaxPacketSize 0x0400 1x 1024 bytes + wMaxPacketSize 0x0200 1x 512 bytes bInterval 0 - bMaxBurst 15 -Binary Object Store Descriptor: - bLength 5 - bDescriptorType 15 - wTotalLength 22 - bNumDeviceCaps 2 - USB 2.0 Extension Device Capability: - bLength 7 - bDescriptorType 16 - bDevCapabilityType 2 - bmAttributes 0x00000002 - Link Power Management (LPM) Supported - SuperSpeed USB Device Capability: - bLength 10 - bDescriptorType 16 - bDevCapabilityType 3 - bmAttributes 0x00 - Latency Tolerance Messages (LTM) Supported - wSpeedsSupported 0x000e - Device can operate at Full Speed (12Mbps) - Device can operate at High Speed (480Mbps) - Device can operate at SuperSpeed (5Gbps) - bFunctionalitySupport 1 - Lowest fully-functional device speed is Full Speed (12Mbps) - bU1DevExitLat 10 micro seconds - bU2DevExitLat 2047 micro seconds Device Status: 0x0001 Self Powered Thank you for the info. Will there be a new hardware revision of the chip? It is not possible to correct using newer firmware, right? Martin > > Thanks and Best Regards, > Alexis Cortes. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html