On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 12:44:57AM +0200, Jiri Kosina wrote: > On Wed, 25 Apr 2012, Alan Stern wrote: > > > On Wed, 25 Apr 2012, Oliver Neukum wrote: > > > > > From 9ff6b78dc59c98b9844dc9922549fd338828a889 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > > From: Oliver Neukum <oliver@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 12:50:37 +0200 > > > Subject: [PATCH] usbhid: prevent deadlock during timeout > > > > > > On some HCDs usb_unlink_urb() can directly call the > > > completion handler. That limits the spinlocks that can > > > be taken in the handler to locks not held while calling > > > usb_unlink_urb() > > > To prevent a race with resubmission, this patch exposes > > > usbcore's infrastructure for blocking submission, uses it > > > and so drops the lock without causing a race in usbhid. > > > > Simply preventing resubmission is a good idea. > > > > > Signed-off-by: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@xxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > drivers/hid/usbhid/hid-core.c | 61 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- > > > drivers/usb/core/urb.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++ > > > include/linux/usb.h | 2 + > > > 3 files changed, 87 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > > > This should be split into two patches: one for usbhid and one for > > usbcore. > > Alternatively you can use my > > Acked-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@xxxxxxx> > > for the usbhid part and apply through USB tree. > > Thanks everybody, Wait, was this really a valid solution here? If so, can someone bounce this to me... thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
