On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 10:16:31AM +0300, Alexander Shishkin wrote: > On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 16:07:37 +0200, Michael Grzeschik <m.grzeschik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Call container_of after we have ensured that gadget is not NULL. > > Like Felipe says, the correct fix would be to drop the NULL > check. Again, I will include a fix for this in my rework patchset if you > don't mind. > > It would probably make sense for us to join efforts on fixing this > driver somehow so that we don't end up fixing the same things, probably > I should create a tree for it somewhere with all the work that I'm doing > or what's would be the best/most convenient approach? Felipe, any > suggestions? I guess sharing a tree would make it easier... but it's a matter of taste, of course :-p -- balbi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
