>> That seems to basically revert the patch sent earlier by David Daney, if I
>> don't
>
> Doesn't directly revert but undoes the intended effect of that commit.
>
>> mistake? Shouldn't that commit be pointed to as guilty instead of an
>> innocent
>> merge commit this patch points to?
>
> I mean 53c6bc24fdc8db87109a5760579cbb060fa644cf (usb: Don't make
> USB_ARCH_HAS_{XHCI,OHCI,EHCI} depend on USB_SUPPORT.)
Please accept my apologies for not having/taking the time to research it
thoroughly and just sending a quick and dirty solution that did not fix the
problem as it should be fixed, like David Daney solution does.
Best regards
Julian Wollrath
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
