Re: [PATCH] USB: Set hub depth after USB3 hub reset

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2012/2/24 Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 07:03:55PM -0800, Sarah Sharp wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 11:17:05AM +0800, Elric Fu wrote:
>> > 2012/2/22 Sarah Sharp <sarah.a.sharp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>> > > On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 01:32:27PM +0800, Elric Fu wrote:
>> > > Perfect, thanks!  I'll send this off to Greg.  The only thing you needed
>> > > was to Cc the stable mailing list.
>> >
>> > Thank you very much. I learn a lot of things from you. About Cc the
>> > stable mail list, I always thought I shouldn't cc stable and if the patch
>> > is done I should send the patch to maintainer then the maintainer will
>> > submit it to stable. It seems like a mistake. Do you mean I should cc
>> > the stable if the patch is done?
>>
>> Hmm, you should probably ask Greg about the stable mailing list and when
>> things get sent to it.  Here's my understanding:
>>
>> You are correct that only the final patch should be sent to the stable
>> mailing list.  That's sent automatically when Linus pulls a new
>> patch into his tree, but only if the stable mailing address is at the
>> end of the patch description.  If someone forgets to put the Cc stable
>> line in the patch description, it's very likely to not make it into
>> stable.
>>
>> You can rely on the subsystem maintainer to add the stable CC line if
>> you wish.  Not all of them are very good at sending things to stable
>> though, so you might want to do it yourself.
>>
>> If I have an RFC patch that I know will need to go into stable, I add
>> the Cc stable line in the description of the body.  However, when I send
>> the RFC patch out, I make sure that it doesn't get sent to the stable
>> mailing list (this may require controlling what git send-email does).
>> When I send a pull request off to Greg, I don't send the mail off to the
>> stable list then either.
>>
>> I think that Greg's pull request to Linus also doesn't include the
>> stable mailing list, but I'm not sure.  I think that only when the final
>> patch goes into Linus' tree does it get sent to the stable mailing list.
>
> The file, Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt describe how to properly
> submit a patch for inclusion in the stable kernel tree if you are
> interested.
>
> The only thing you really need to do is add the:
>        Cc: stable <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> to the signed-off-by: area of the patch, to get it included in a stable
> kernel release automatically.
>
> If you cc: the stable list when sending it to the usb list, to me, or
> anyone else, is not a big deal or needed, as when it hits Linus's tree
> is the most important thing.  Just be sure that if you do copy the
> stable list, the cc: be in the proper place in the patch, not just in
> the email header, otherwise you will get an automated email from me
> pointing this problem out.  I can't track patches by hand if they have
> gone into Linus's tree or not, so I rely on the automatic notification
> the signed-off-by area provides me, if a patch is copied to the list
> earlier is not a problem at all, I easily filter that away.
>
> Hope this helps,

Got it. Thank you very much for your reply.

Best Regards,
Elric Fu
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Old Linux USB Devel Archive]

  Powered by Linux