Re: [PATCH] USB: Set hub depth after USB3 hub reset

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 07:03:55PM -0800, Sarah Sharp wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 11:17:05AM +0800, Elric Fu wrote:
> > 2012/2/22 Sarah Sharp <sarah.a.sharp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> > > On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 01:32:27PM +0800, Elric Fu wrote:
> > > Perfect, thanks!  I'll send this off to Greg.  The only thing you needed
> > > was to Cc the stable mailing list.
> > 
> > Thank you very much. I learn a lot of things from you. About Cc the
> > stable mail list, I always thought I shouldn't cc stable and if the patch
> > is done I should send the patch to maintainer then the maintainer will
> > submit it to stable. It seems like a mistake. Do you mean I should cc
> > the stable if the patch is done?
> 
> Hmm, you should probably ask Greg about the stable mailing list and when
> things get sent to it.  Here's my understanding:
> 
> You are correct that only the final patch should be sent to the stable
> mailing list.  That's sent automatically when Linus pulls a new
> patch into his tree, but only if the stable mailing address is at the
> end of the patch description.  If someone forgets to put the Cc stable
> line in the patch description, it's very likely to not make it into
> stable.
> 
> You can rely on the subsystem maintainer to add the stable CC line if
> you wish.  Not all of them are very good at sending things to stable
> though, so you might want to do it yourself.
> 
> If I have an RFC patch that I know will need to go into stable, I add
> the Cc stable line in the description of the body.  However, when I send
> the RFC patch out, I make sure that it doesn't get sent to the stable
> mailing list (this may require controlling what git send-email does).
> When I send a pull request off to Greg, I don't send the mail off to the
> stable list then either.
> 
> I think that Greg's pull request to Linus also doesn't include the
> stable mailing list, but I'm not sure.  I think that only when the final
> patch goes into Linus' tree does it get sent to the stable mailing list.

The file, Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt describe how to properly
submit a patch for inclusion in the stable kernel tree if you are
interested.

The only thing you really need to do is add the:
	Cc: stable <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
to the signed-off-by: area of the patch, to get it included in a stable
kernel release automatically.

If you cc: the stable list when sending it to the usb list, to me, or
anyone else, is not a big deal or needed, as when it hits Linus's tree
is the most important thing.  Just be sure that if you do copy the
stable list, the cc: be in the proper place in the patch, not just in
the email header, otherwise you will get an automated email from me
pointing this problem out.  I can't track patches by hand if they have
gone into Linus's tree or not, so I rely on the automatic notification
the signed-off-by area provides me, if a patch is copied to the list
earlier is not a problem at all, I easily filter that away.

Hope this helps,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Old Linux USB Devel Archive]

  Powered by Linux