On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 19:19, Dan Williams <dcbw@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, 2012-02-28 at 11:14 +0100, Maik Zumstrull wrote: >> ttyUSB0 acts like a modem. That it opens instantly holds with picocom >> as well, the other ones hang for a bit. >> ttyUSB1 doesn't seem to take AT commands (no response). >> ttyUSB2 takes AT commands. >> >> Both AT-capable ports reply "COMMAND NOT SUPPORT" [sic] to AT^GETPORTMODE. > > But ttyUSB2 still has the close() blocking problem while ttyUSB0 does > not? Yes. ttyUSB2 has the same functionality as 0 and the same timing issues as 1. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
