Hi, On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 10:01:33PM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote: > Heiko Stübner wrote: > > > > Am Dienstag, 24. Januar 2012, 11:15:11 schrieb Felipe Balbi: > > > On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 11:13:00AM +0100, Heiko Stübner wrote: > > > > sorry for mail spam :-) > > > > > > > > Am Dienstag, 24. Januar 2012, 10:51:31 schrieb Felipe Balbi: > > > > > On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 10:50:14AM +0100, Heiko Stübner wrote: > > > > > > Hi Felipe, > > > > > > > > > > > > Am Dienstag, 24. Januar 2012, 10:38:32 schrieb Felipe Balbi: > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Jan 08, 2012 at 09:59:02PM +0100, Heiko Stübner wrote: > > > > > > > > The phy-power-handling is common to S3C2443/2416/2450, so > > > > > > > > introduce a s3c2443-pm-common.c to handle this for all of them. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This makes it possible to remove the raw write to the > > > > > > > > PWRCFG-register from the s3c-hsudc driver. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I believe this doesn't really depend on previous patches (??) In > > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > > > > > > case, it can be carried with s3c's tree: > > > > > > it does depend on the previous patch [2/3], as the device power > > > > > > domain is controlled through the runtime-pm subsystem whose calls > > > > > > were added in it. > > > > > > > > > > then I will need proper acks to carry this patch. > > > > > > > > another possibility would be to have patch 2 and 3 get in through the > > > > samsung tree, as the majority of the change lies on this side (i.e. > > > > introducing a new file in plat-s3c24xx) > > > > > > yet another one, would be to defer patch 3/3 by one merge window ;-) > > > > also fine by me ;-) > > > > But let's see first what Kgene says. > > Hi all, > > Sorry for join lately on this. > > I think we need to implement more pm domain for s3c24xx as well > usbphy. So if Felipe is ok, I'd like to handle Heiko's 2nd and 3rd > patches in my tree. Of course, I need Felipe's ack before that. > BTW, frankly, I'm not sure we can finish supporting pm domain for all > of s3c24xx for v3.4 :) In that case, how about we take things slow ? I can carry pm-runtime patch (2/3) and by 3.5 or 3.6 you will only need to touch arch/arm/-related code. If you guarantee that it won't make it in 3.4, I'm ok carrying pm-runtime patch as it won't break anything anyway (I suppose). -- balbi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
