On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 11:09:48AM +0100, Heiko Stübner wrote: > Am Dienstag, 24. Januar 2012, 10:51:31 schrieb Felipe Balbi: > > On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 10:50:14AM +0100, Heiko Stübner wrote: > > > Hi Felipe, > > > > > > Am Dienstag, 24. Januar 2012, 10:38:32 schrieb Felipe Balbi: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > On Sun, Jan 08, 2012 at 09:59:02PM +0100, Heiko Stübner wrote: > > > > > The phy-power-handling is common to S3C2443/2416/2450, so introduce a > > > > > s3c2443-pm-common.c to handle this for all of them. > > > > > > > > > > This makes it possible to remove the raw write to the PWRCFG-register > > > > > from the s3c-hsudc driver. > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > I believe this doesn't really depend on previous patches (??) In that > > > > > > > case, it can be carried with s3c's tree: > > > it does depend on the previous patch [2/3], as the device power domain is > > > controlled through the runtime-pm subsystem whose calls were added in it. > > > > then I will need proper acks to carry this patch. > > ok, I will pester Kukjin Kim more about it to get the needed ack :-) . > > If changes are requested to this third patch should I only resubmit this one > or all of them again - i.e. will you still keep the first two patches? first two are already applied so no need to resend them :-) -- balbi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
