Am Mittwoch, 11. Januar 2012, 11:56:37 schrieb Markus Kolb: > On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 11:35:16 +0100, Oliver Neukum wrote: > > Am Mittwoch, 11. Januar 2012, 11:29:57 schrieb Markus Kolb: > >> Is it really a broken union descriptor? > >> There is all information but the original cdc_ether code can only > >> handle union descriptor which starts with 0. > >> That is something e.g. the Windows driver can handle. > > > > Possibly cdc-ether is also broken, but the descriptor refers to > > interfaces > > 4 and 5 which don't exist. > > > > Regards > > Oliver > > Ok. You're right, I've reminded. > Is there another way to get the correct interface numbers or is the > defensive guess of my patch ok? The interface association descriptor has the correct interfaces. I am not sure it is a valid thing to fall back to it. Regards Oliver -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
