On Mon, 17 Oct 2011, Paul Zimmerman wrote: > > From: Alan Stern [mailto:stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > > Sent: Saturday, October 15, 2011 12:40 PM > > > > The analyzer screenshot shows that the device did send back only one > > byte of data. So this appears to be a bug in the CV program itself, > > not a violation of any sort. In fact, the error message indicates that > > the mass-storage gadgets' current behavior is correct. (But maybe the > > CV program prints out the wrong error message -- this would still be a > > bug, of course.) > > > > Does the same thing happen if you run the test using an EHCI controller > > instead of XHCI? > > This is the USB 3.0 command verifier, so it only supports xHCI > controllers as the test host. However, if I connect the device as > a USB 2.0 device, the test fails in exactly the same way. All right. Guess I'll have to try to do my own testing with the USB-2.0 CV. If the two CVs give inconsistent results, that will be a very good reason to complain to the USB-IF. Alan Stern -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
