On 10/13/2011 07:31 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 05:01:52PM +0200, Michael Grzeschik wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 01:51:52PM +0200, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote: >>> On 10/11/2011 06:54 AM, Pavan Kondeti wrote: >>>>> while playing around with gadgetfs and the ci13xxx_udc driver on mx28 >>>>> I found some problems regarding locking and DMA handling. Another problem >>>>> arises when using the ci13xxx_udc driver on mx28, because it has only 8 >>>>> compared to 16 endpoints as the driver expects. >>> >>>>> With these patches g_ether and gadgetfs work on the mx28, however I was >>>>> not able to test these patches on any other hardware. Voluntaries welcome. >>> >>>> Thanks for the improvements and bug fixes in ci13xxx_udc driver. All the >>>> patches looks good to me. I am slightly busy with other stuff. Will test >>>> these patches on MSM platform next week. >>> >>> We've discovered a problem with the driver (on a mx23). >>> g_zero test 2 fails. >> >> We now are able to get all g_zero tests [1] working, but for that we have to >> load the g_zero module with buflen=512. >> >> Has this to do with the limitation in the _hardware_enqueue routine that >> it currently can not handle requests which would spawn into several TDs? > > I just need a decision if I should take these on this merge window or > wait a bit longer :-) If you can check if these patches don't breaking any existing platforms, then this can go into this merge window. I don't have any MSM platform available... regards, Marc -- Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde | Industrial Linux Solutions | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 | Vertretung West/Dortmund | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | http://www.pengutronix.de |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
