Hi, On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 05:01:52PM +0200, Michael Grzeschik wrote: > On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 01:51:52PM +0200, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote: > > On 10/11/2011 06:54 AM, Pavan Kondeti wrote: > > >> while playing around with gadgetfs and the ci13xxx_udc driver on mx28 > > >> I found some problems regarding locking and DMA handling. Another problem > > >> arises when using the ci13xxx_udc driver on mx28, because it has only 8 > > >> compared to 16 endpoints as the driver expects. > > > > >> With these patches g_ether and gadgetfs work on the mx28, however I was > > >> not able to test these patches on any other hardware. Voluntaries welcome. > > > > > Thanks for the improvements and bug fixes in ci13xxx_udc driver. All the > > > patches looks good to me. I am slightly busy with other stuff. Will test > > > these patches on MSM platform next week. > > > > We've discovered a problem with the driver (on a mx23). > > g_zero test 2 fails. > > We now are able to get all g_zero tests [1] working, but for that we have to > load the g_zero module with buflen=512. > > Has this to do with the limitation in the _hardware_enqueue routine that > it currently can not handle requests which would spawn into several TDs? I just need a decision if I should take these on this merge window or wait a bit longer :-) -- balbi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
