On Friday 02 September 2011 08:17:59 Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > On Thursday 01 September 2011 14:51:48 Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > > Hm, this bit is descitbed as self-clearing. Do we indeed see it set? > > Yes, try to poll it just after it is set and you will see it is not cleared > ASAP. There is another simple experiment you can do in the lab if you don't believe my fix is correct: Make a polling loop polling the IRQ handler instead of the interrupt vector, sometimes fast sometimes slow. Then observe what happens with and without the patch. --HPS -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
