On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 02:53:39PM +0530, ABRAHAM, KISHON VIJAY wrote: > > Why not IRQF_SHARED? What is wrong with IRQF_SHARED? We determine the source > > of the IRQ thanks to ehci spec. > I just wanted the flexibility to set irqflag to any value :-) Then please say so and don't make IRQF_SHARED look bad :) > >> With irq chaining for remote wakeup (still this is wip > >> for OMAP4), the irqflag should have IRQF_NO_SUSPEND set. We should > >> have a way to set irqflag to different value and this value should be > >> set based on the platform. > > > > So you want a way to set IRQF_NO_SUSPEND for remote wakeup? I think this > > could be arranged. > yes. cool :-) Is there a way that I can know this upfront? Like a flag somewhere or an assigned callback which isn't there otherwise? Sebastian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
