Re: [PATCH 6/6] usb: musb: Add support for ti81xx platform

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 11:01:54AM +0530, Gupta, Ajay Kumar wrote:
> > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/musb/musb_core.c
> > > b/drivers/usb/musb/musb_core.c index 20a2873..07f3faf 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/usb/musb/musb_core.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/usb/musb/musb_core.c
> > > @@ -1014,7 +1014,9 @@ static void musb_shutdown(struct
> > platform_device *pdev)
> > >  	|| defined(CONFIG_USB_MUSB_OMAP2PLUS)		\
> > >  	|| defined(CONFIG_USB_MUSB_OMAP2PLUS_MODULE)	\
> > >  	|| defined(CONFIG_USB_MUSB_AM35X)		\
> > > -	|| defined(CONFIG_USB_MUSB_AM35X_MODULE)
> > > +	|| defined(CONFIG_USB_MUSB_AM35X_MODULE)	\
> > > +	|| defined(CONFIG_USB_MUSB_TI81XX)		\
> > > +	|| defined(CONFIG_USB_MUSB_TI81XX_MODULE)
> > 
> > we really need to find a better way to handle this :-(
> 
> How about passing the mode info from musb_config (musb->config->fifo_mode),
> same way as musb->config->fifo_cfg 

not sure... Ideally we wouldn't really need those fifo tables, but I'm
still thinking how to properly do that.

> Infact I think, we can kill musb->config->fifo_cfg and have only
> musb->config->mode as in this way all the fifo tables will be at one
> place and should help in maintenance.

The idea of musb->config->fifo_cfg was to allow boards to pass their
optimal fifo table. If a certain product, knows it will only support
mass storage, why not letting them enable only those needed endpoints in
an optimized way (with double buffering, bulk combine/split, etc).

> > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/musb/ti81xx.c b/drivers/usb/musb/ti81xx.c
> > new
> > > file mode 100644 index 0000000..f95774e
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/drivers/usb/musb/ti81xx.c
> > 
> > I still think this should be part of am35x.c It really look like they
> > are very similar.
> 
> Wrapper registers are different but I will see on this and provide you details
> On how the merged file would look like. I am afraid that we may have to use
> Either #ifdef or cpu_is_xxx().

we can use platform_device_id to cope with the differences :-) See how
I'm using it on dwc3 driver (Greg's usb-next branch).

-- 
balbi

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Old Linux USB Devel Archive]

  Powered by Linux