Hi, On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 01:36:58PM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/misc/usbtest.c b/drivers/usb/misc/usbtest.c > > > index bb10846..bd71500 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/usb/misc/usbtest.c > > > +++ b/drivers/usb/misc/usbtest.c > > > @@ -359,8 +359,10 @@ static int simple_io( > > > urb->context = &completion; > > > while (retval == 0 && iterations-- > 0) { > > > init_completion(&completion); > > > - if (usb_pipeout(urb->pipe)) > > > + if (usb_pipeout(urb->pipe)) { > > > simple_fill_buf(urb); > > > + urb->transfer_flags |= URB_ZERO_PACKET; > > > + } > > > retval = usb_submit_urb(urb, GFP_KERNEL); > > > if (retval != 0) > > > break; > > > > this looks good to me, as of today, the only way to pass testusb is to > > cancel requests when we start the next one, rather then having them > > completed. Adding a ZLP on the requests, will force the requests to > > complete even though they have a size which is aligned to > > wMaxPacketSize, which allow us to remove the hackish abort transfer on > > all UDCs. > > But don't you need that to handle this type of thing properly if it were > to happen with a "real" device? So you really can't remove that check, > so we should leave the usbtest driver alone, right? From USB in a nutshell we have: "A bulk transfer is considered complete when it has transferred the exact amount of data requested, transferred a packet less than the maximum endpoint size, or transferred a zero-length packet." From USB 3.0 Specification we have (4.4.6.1): "A bulk transfer is complete when the endpoint does one of the following: . Has transferred exactly the amount of data expected. . Transfers a data packet with a payload less than 1024 bytes. . Responds with a STALL handshake." From USB 2.0 Specification we have (5.8.3) "A bulk transfer is complete when the endpoint does one of the following: . Has transferred exactly the amount of data expected . Transfers a packet with a payload size less than wMaxPacketSize or transfers a zero-length packet" In this particular test case, we are falling in a situation where gadget driver waits to receive 4096 bytes, but host only sends 2048 bytes. Withtout a packet which is less than wMaxPacketSize, we don't know when to finish the transfer. Clearly a ZLP is needed here IMHO. Doing an Abort transfer on the next EP IRQ sounds very hackish to me and this is actually a long standing bug of the Gadget Framework which was added just to get g_zero to work rather than fixing the broken usbtest.c module. -- balbi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature