Hi, On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 04:43:54PM +0300, Heikki Krogerus wrote: > On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 04:36:11PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > > Very well, we'll call it usb_mode? > > > > usb_phy_mode ? usb_transceiver_mode ? You still have to refer it to the > > transceiver somehow, IMO > > OK, I'll change it. The states themselves will be something like > USB_PHY_STATE_<THESTATE>. sounds good to me. -- balbi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
