Hi, On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 04:01:34PM +0300, Heikki Krogerus wrote: > On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 03:59:34PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 03:39:03PM +0300, Heikki Krogerus wrote: > > > Changes since v2: > > > - Renamed usb_transceiver to usb_phy > > > - usb_otg_mode left in struct usb_phy > > > > do you still callit usb_otg_mode ? > > They are defined in OTG spec so why not. because they are not OTG-specific as I said before. The only states which are OTG-specific is A_DEVICE and B_HOST. You need to keep in mind that the OTG specification builds on top of USB specification. Furthermore, current OTG is called "OTG and Embedded Hosts", which should already be enough to say 'this isn't OTG-specific'. -- balbi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
