Hi, On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 02:42:56PM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote: > Yes, that's clear to me. I just wondered what exact names we should use > to register a phy. > > Consider a phy registering itself with > > usb_register_transceiver(recv) with recv->name = "mxc-ehci.0" > > (where recv->name could be passed from platform_data) > > Then the mxc-ehci driver could get its receiver using > > usb_get_transceiver(dev_name(&pdev->dev)) > > or with > > usb_get_transceiver(&pdev->dev); > > when we do what I suggested. This would be similar to the clocks which > get the clocks associated to a device with clk_get(&pdev->dev, id). > > This would change the behaviour of usb_get_transceiver() from "give me > the phy with this name" to "give me the transceiver associated with this > device". It would prevent us from inventing arbitrary phy names. OK, I understand now. We need to think about this. It could be worth doing. I need to make a new version of these, so I can try something like that. Thanks, -- heikki -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
