Hi, On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 10:18:23AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > On Wednesday 03 August 2011 00:50:42 Felipe Balbi wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 12:11:53AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > > On Tuesday 02 August 2011 23:19:24 Felipe Balbi wrote: > > > > On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 11:33:29PM +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote: > > > > > It was pointed out by 'make versioncheck' that linux/version.h was > > > > > not always being included where needed and sometimes included > > > > > needlessly in drivers/usb/. > > > > > This patch fixes up the includes. > > > > > > > > > > For the UVC gadget driver bits, this was ACK'ed by Laurent Pinchart. > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <jj@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > Acked-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > --- > > > > > > > > > > drivers/usb/gadget/uvc.h | 1 + > > > > > drivers/usb/gadget/uvc_v4l2.c | 1 - > > > > > drivers/usb/storage/realtek_cr.c | 1 - > > > > > 3 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/uvc.h b/drivers/usb/gadget/uvc.h > > > > > index 5b79194..81971fb 100644 > > > > > --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/uvc.h > > > > > +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/uvc.h > > > > > @@ -56,6 +56,7 @@ struct uvc_event > > > > > > > > > > #include <linux/usb.h> /* For usb_endpoint_* */ > > > > > #include <linux/usb/gadget.h> > > > > > #include <linux/videodev2.h> > > > > > > > > > > +#include <linux/version.h> > > > > > > > > does uvc.h really needs <linux/version.h> ?? Laurent ? > > > > > > uvc.h has > > > > > > #define DRIVER_VERSION_NUMBER KERNEL_VERSION(0, 1, 0) > > > > > > This is used in drivers/usb/gadget/uvc_v4l2.c only. > > > > > > As the uvc gadget driver lives in-tree, the best fix is probably to > > > remove DRIVER_VERSION_NUMBER completely, and replace it with > > > LINUX_VERSION_CODE where it is used. > > > > yeah, I can agree with that, but do you need a MODULE_VERSION() anyway ? > > Would it be better to just remove the MODULE_VERSION altogether as > > there's no real benefit from having it ? > > DRIVER_VERSION_NUMBER isn't used as a MODULE_VERSION() argument. The driver > uses it to report its version through the V4L2 API. ahaa, ok. fine by me then. -- balbi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature