Hello. On 26.07.2011 16:03, Oliver Neukum wrote:
@@ -1059,13 +1060,15 @@ int xhci_urb_enqueue(struct usb_hcd *hcd, struct urb *urb, gfp_t mem_flags) if (!urb_priv) return -ENOMEM;
+ buffer = kzalloc(size * sizeof(struct xhci_td), mem_flags);
kcalloc() fits somewhat better here.
Is this really safe on all architectures? kmalloc() guarantees that you can manipulate a TD without affecting other TDs
Hm, well, kcalloc() is impelemeted the same way as kmalloc(), via call to __kmalloc().
Regards Oliver
WBR, Sergei -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
