Am Dienstag, 26. Juli 2011, 13:17:12 schrieb Sergei Shtylyov: Hi, > > @@ -1059,13 +1060,15 @@ int xhci_urb_enqueue(struct usb_hcd *hcd, struct urb *urb, gfp_t mem_flags) > > if (!urb_priv) > > return -ENOMEM; > > > > + buffer = kzalloc(size * sizeof(struct xhci_td), mem_flags); > > kcalloc() fits somewhat better here. Is this really safe on all architectures? kmalloc() guarantees that you can manipulate a TD without affecting other TDs Regards Oliver -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
