> Yes, using cpu_is_* is really a bad method here :-) > But I had to follow that bad method so far, I don't think you 'had to'... > hope we could see some change from sascha. ...because you could have asked him about the status of these patches. Regerds, Wolfram -- Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
