On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 11:13:21PM -0500, Theodore Kilgore wrote: > Well, I guess I have not kept up with the latest. It didn't used to do > that. I still can't help wondering if isochronous transport through libusb > would really work for webcam application, though, because userspace access > to a piece of hardware will almost surely be less direct than kernel > access. Sort of by instinct, I would say that there would be too many > layers of code one on top of the other. People have been running USB video cameras for years (i.e. 2.4 days) using usbfs as a userspace driver just fine, and libusb really isn't that "thick" at all so it should be very possible to do this. thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
