* Alan Stern | 2011-05-20 11:09:58 [-0400]: >On Fri, 20 May 2011, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > >> The only difference is that the first replacement in >> usb_gadget_unregister_driver() now also calls usb_hcd_poll_rh_status(). >> It doesn't look like it causes any harm. > >This may be simply a matter of personal taste, but I don't like to read >patch descriptions that make no sense without reading the patch title >first. It's as though somebody started a conversation by saying: "The >difference is that Linux is open." -- it makes me go "What?" I try to add something into the body so it does not make you go "What?" :) >> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >This patch is okay with me, Is this an Acked-by? >but it is likely to conflict with the work >that Tatyana and Felipe are doing. You might want to coordinate with >them first. It clashes with Tatyana's SS-addon and with the udc-class. That is why I want to get it out of the way asap. I'm not aware that Felipe has something in the pipe. Tanya, do you want this on-top of your patches or the other way around? It works both ways for me. >Alan Stern > Sebastian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
