* Alan Stern | 2011-04-14 14:22:48 [-0400]: >Ah, okay. I saw that you had made the two patches into a series, but I >didn't realize that the second patch was intended to fix up a failure >mode created by the first patch. > >(It would have been better to do them in the opposite order, so that a >random bisection search wouldn't happen to create a kernel containing >the failure mode.) If one is bisecting the tree and is not messing with hcd->flags member then he won't run into this. >Alan Stern Sebastian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
